https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133551
--- Comment #38 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #36) > (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #34) > > RPM cannot parse the linked spec file - the %{gittag} macro is undefined > > (and it looks like it's no longer used). > > It was cut and paste directly from the packaging guidelines you suggested in > comment 18, point 3. I will remove. Yes, but those guidelines should also mention that you need to actually define those macros somewhere :) In this case, I'm pretty sure you can just replace %{gittag} with version. > > Additionally, at first glance, "%global debug_package %{nil}" is a red flag. > > It should not be needed - but if it *is* needed to make RPM happy, then the > > package is built without debuginfo, i.e. with nonstandard compiler flags. I > > can't see any indication of custom cargo profiles, so likely "%global > > debug_package %{nil}" can just be removed to restore debuginfo subpackage > > generation. > > Probabky a left over of the 100 revisions. Can't those just be fixed on > commit? Sure. (In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #37) > (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #35) > > Note: I see that the License tag is now included in all subpackages. You > > could make updating it easier by deduplicating it, i.e. defining something > > like > > > > %global binary_license Apache-2.0 AND (Apache-2.0 OR BSL-1.0) AND ... > > > > at the top of the spec file and using "License: %binary_license" in > > subpackages. > > Sure, but I was just copying what rust-rpm-sequoia has as you had suggested, > again I see this as a minor point that can be fixed on commit?? rpm-sequoia has only one subpackage, so there's nothing to de-duplicate. But yes, this can be fixed post-approval-pre-import. In the meantime, I'll try to make fedora-review work in the case where the linked spec file is invalid ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133551 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202133551%23c38 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
