https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215174
--- Comment #5 from Jeremy Newton <[email protected]> --- > This is a noarch package, but I went with an exclusive arch because to be > useful the rest of rocm needs to be supported on more than x86_64. We would > have unhappy ppc, arm and s390 folks that installed this package and got > frustrated that nothing else worked. Well you can set both exclusive arch AND noarch and it will work (they aren't mutually exclusive). See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_noarch_with_unported_dependencies But if you use noarch, I think you should only apply noarch to the devel subpackage to tell koji to specifically build it on a x86_64 machine only. I'm not 100% sure if this is correct. E.g: %package devel BuildArch: noarch But I'm also okay with keeping as-is if you think that's clearer/cleaner. I kicked off a copr build, and will review it when it's done: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mystro256/rocm-hip/build/6087516/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215174 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202215174%23c5 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
