https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214296
--- Comment #6 from David Cantrell <[email protected]> --- Issues: 1) The License field must only carry the expression of licenses for the content used to create the binary packages. The expression should be: LGPL-2.1-or-later AND CC0-1.0 AND CC-BY-SA-4.0 The MIT-Modern-Variant for the files in cmake/modules/ should not be listed because those files are not part of the binary packages. Nor should the GPL-3.0-only identifier be listed because that is a linked dependency and not part of this package. For more information: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/ https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_no_effective_license_analysis 2) The qt5 and qt6 subpackages lack an explicit versioned requires on the main package: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214296 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202214296%23c6 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
