https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223010
Michel Alexandre Salim <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?([email protected] | |me) --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Benson Muite from comment #3) > If the license file is in > %{python3_sitelib}/%{srcname}-%{version}.dist-info/LICENSE > a separate license declaration is not needed. See also: > https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1223 that did not say that - it says you're allowed to package the license file with an absolute path, but it has to be marked as a license. Right now that's not the case. See e.g. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-nu-engine/blob/3304b2b1c6aba1728b57ab6ef585a957a84f3d43/f/rust-nu-engine.spec#_33 for one of the Rust examples. There are Python projects where the wheel tags the LICENSE file as a license, such that rpm -qpL picks it up, but that's not the case here michel in reviews/davide/2223010-python-inquirer ⬢ [fedora-toolbox:38] ❯ rpm -qpL ./results/*noarch.rpm michel in reviews/davide/2223010-python-inquirer ⬢ [fedora-toolbox:38] ❯ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223010 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202223010%23c4 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
