https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224629



--- Comment #14 from Tyler Fanelli <[email protected]> ---
> I couldn't even untar the file with "tar -xzvf" (not valid gzip?) or gnome's
> archive manager (it just crashed)

Hm, I must have done something wrong there when tar'ing.

> so it was very suspicious ;)

I don't blame you :)


> The package looks good to me now, I only have three non-blocking comments:
> 
> 1. There's only an rpmlint warning that might be interesting for upstream:
> 
> snphost.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/bin/snphost
> /lib64/libm.so.6
> 
> Not sure if linking with libm is still necessary, as far as I know, at least
> recent Fedora versions merged libm into libc again?

How would I check which package is requiring this import?

> 
> 2. Also please add a comment why you're doing "ExcludeArch: x86_64" before
> you import the package.
> Something like "this is only supported on AMD hardware" would be enough.

Noted, will do.

> 
> 3. It looks like upstream project has an asdiidoc file that can be built
> into a manpage?
> If you add a BR for asciidoctor (or something like it) and build the man
> page in %build, you could install it alongside the binary. Users might find
> that helpful.
> 

Agreed, will do.

> Side note: Please take care to import the original / "unprocessed" spec file
> wrt/ rpmautospec (i.e. it should have "Release: %autorelease", "%changelog\n
> %autochangelog"). If you want to avoid this problem (different spec file
> inside / outside SRPM), I recommend using plain "rpmbuild -bs" to generate
> the SRPM file instead of "fedpkg srpm".

Noted. Thanks for pointing that out.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224629

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202224629%23c14
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to