https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444
--- Comment #64 from Yunying Sun <[email protected]> --- Sorry for the delay. Now updated spec file and srpm are available at: https://yunyings.fedorapeople.org/sgxsdk.spec https://yunyings.fedorapeople.org/sgxsdk-2.20.100.0-1.fc39.src.rpm To address recent comments since Jun 28, the spec changes included in this update: 1. Removed license statement about Intel binaries in comments. 2. Added comment to clarify how the repacked tarball on 01.org is generated from github source. 3. Added "Requires gcc-c++", and moved "Requires:" behind the "Buildrequires:" section. 4. Using "%autosetup" instead of "%setup". 5. Removed subpackage "sgxsdk-samples" stuff, which will be added later after sgx-aesm-service available Fedora. 6. Updated to release 2.20.100(which is upstream 2.20 release plus some unpublished code changes to fix compiling errors found on Fedora rawhide). Please help to review it again. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202085444%23c64 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
