Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674738 --- Comment #6 from nucleo <[email protected]> 2011-02-04 14:13:56 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) > You should read > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios > which tells you how to properly indicate the license in this situation. > If your package contains files which are under multiple, distinct, and > independent licenses, then the spec must reflect this by using "and" GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ distinct, and independent licenses? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
