https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149698
Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?([email protected]) CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <[email protected]> --- - Please use autochangelog/autorelease - Requires: libtexpdf = %{version} -> should include arch: Requires: libtexpdf%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} - Why is this bundled? Was it modified by the project? Provides: bundled(lua-lunamark) - Same question about libtexpdf %package -n libtexpdf Summary: bundled with SILE It seems that it is straight taken from another repo. Why don't you package it separately? Also that Summary is a no go. We don't care about the fact that it is bundled in the summary, the user needs to know what this package do. I saw https://github.com/sile-typesetter/libtexpdf/issues/25 and it seems there is no release tarball anymore, but you can still grab an archive from a commit. I saw this too https://github.com/sile-typesetter/libtexpdf/issues/3#issuecomment-1301767989 but there is a cmake script now and you only need zlib and libpng. Please consider it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149698 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202149698%23c4 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
