https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233248

Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|[email protected]    |[email protected]
                 CC|                            |[email protected]
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?



--- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> ---
Two minor issues:

1. "LGPL-2.1" is a deprecated SPDX license identifier. It should likely be
"LGPL-2.1-only" or "LGPL-2.1-or-later", but I'm not sure which one.
Looks like I missed this in the review for glycin-utils, which has the same
issue. :(

2. You can add "autobins = false" to the "[package]" section of Cargo.toml to
prevent automatic detection of binaries, that would save you from doing this
manually in %prep. It's not even a test (i.e. it's a [[bin]] target, not a
[[test]] target), which is why it gets detected as an installable executable by
cargo. If it *were* a proper [[test]] target, having a main() function would be
perfectly fine. But this looks like a development / debugging tool, so setting
"autobins = false" is likely the easiest solution to prevent it from being
built.

Doing "rm src/bin/test.rs" is fine as well, but doing the autobins patch has
the benefit of also making rust2rpm properly recognize this is a library-only /
no debug symbols / no "binary package" package, so you wouldn't need to make
all these modifications manually in addition to doing the rm-ing.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233248

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202233248%23c3
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to