https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134972



--- Comment #16 from Jeremy Linton <[email protected]> ---
As a FYI, I updated the package to use the rh rpms EFI macros for the ESP/etc.
This fixes the complaints in #11 about the efi macros, and also I guess is the
"machinery" referenced as well since in theory the rpm macros can update
/boot/efi to somewhere else in the filesystem? To be clear I wasn't arguing
against those changes (not sure if it came across that way, the point was that
we needed to place files in the ESP/etc and ghost/config'ing them should be
done regardless of whether anaconda/etc rewrites them.).

Also, after some mailing list discussions/etc a change was opened/approved for
this and the related changes for F39, so its getting late I either need some
clear directions or for this to be approved.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cleanup_systemd_install Thanks,


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134972

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202134972%23c16
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to