https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235768
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan S. <[email protected]> --- > * Why clang? Could you build this with gcc? Most of our auto-hardening > features are active with GCC. It also might fix the LTO issue. GCC's Objective-C support is severely lacking, still at a very old state, missing many features and having terrible performance. It doesn't support modern Objective-C at all, and the library needs to be built with Clang in order to allow applications written for Clang to be compiled (different ABIs between GCC and Clang). As for OpenSSL, I switched to GnuTLS as discussed in chat. > If this links to the libraries normally, you don't need this and it should be > dropped. RPM does automatic dependency tracking for linked libraries at the > soname level. All dropped. > This isn't allowed. Library versions need to be tracked in the spec file. Changed. Updated spec file: https://nil.im/objfw.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235768 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235768%23c10 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
