https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240414
Tom Rix <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected], | |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from Tom Rix <[email protected]> --- I am wondering if rocm shouldn't be handled like mpi by using modules. We are always going to switch a set of libs from multiple packages at the same time. instead of the mpi, we would have rocm gpu family backends. ex/ setenv ROCM_LIB /usr/lib64/rocm/gfx11/lib prepend-path LD_LIBRARY_PATH /usr/lib64/rocm/gfx11/lib and there would be new package like rocm-module to set this up. Here is an example of what Benson suggested for gloo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240302 https://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/fed500/gloo/gloo.git/tree/gloo.spec?id=5f4092aba4f411ac9a10fc05d14aeab8909df3d9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240414 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202240414%23c3 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
