https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242858

            Bug ID: 2242858
           Summary: Review Request: rocm-modules - A ROCm module
                    environment
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
         Component: Package Review
          Severity: medium
          Assignee: [email protected]
          Reporter: [email protected]
        QA Contact: [email protected]
                CC: [email protected]
  Target Milestone: ---
    Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/rocm-modules.spec
SRPM URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/rocm-modules-1.0-1.fc40.src.rpm

ROCm libraries require building all the possible AMD gpus as individual models
can have their own ISA's.  As the list of gpus grows and the code required per
gpu also grows, libraries are too large to hold all the code and must be split.
An example of this rocBLAS.

These modules split the lists of gpus along family lines gfx8,gfx9,gfx10,gfx11
and a special default which is the latest two families.

And sets up gpu family specific install locations
/usr/lib64/rocm/<family>/lib,bin

Except for the default, which installs to the normal location 

Reproducible: Always


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242858

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202242858%23c0
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to