https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243345
Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Colin Walters from comment #5) > Thanks for the reply! > > Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~walters/bootc.spec > SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~walters/bootc-0.1.1-1.fc40.src.rpm Thanks, I'll take another look tomorrow. It's getting late. > > PS: Do you have a list of the crates are currently missing from Fedora, > > preventing this package from being built without vendored dependencies? > > Biggest is kube, a dependency which I am really debating because it's kind > of massive overkill for what we need right now. > Though either way as you know it's important to me to keep this spec in sync > with C9S. And I'm sure you know, Keeping the spec file in sync with C9S is an anti-goal, since different rules apply to Fedora and CentOS Stream. The current spec file will also not build on ELN / RHEL, since the RHEL macros for Rust packaging diverge from the Fedora / EPEL macros. Though it *should* build in epel9-next (i.e. EPEL on top of CentOS Stream 9). > > (On second glance, it looks like this was adapted from the rust-bootupd > > package, which explains the unusual structure and issues with duplicate > > License / Summary tags. > > Yes indeed. Fixed those thanks! :+1: > > Pointing rust2rpm at bootc-0.1.1/Cargo.toml should actually give you > > better results than that. :) > > It's a bit messier than that as it's split into sub-crates *internally* but > I don't want to publish those to crates.io; looks like `cargo package` wants > that. I'm sure I could fake it out but...mmm, dunno. Faking things should not be necessary. rust2rpm has supported cargo workspaces for a while (and things not published on crates.io for *ages*) - pointing it at the toplevel Cargo.toml file from the uncompressed source tarball (i.e. literally "rust2rpm bootc-0.1.1/Cargo.toml") should just do "the right thing" (C). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243345 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202243345%23c6 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
