https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244407
Aaron Rainbolt <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Aaron Rainbolt <[email protected]> --- [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros Everything looks good to me, and I have verified locally that the tests passed. PACKAGE APPROVED. Minor nitpick, `%autosetup` works without `-n %{name}-%{version}`, but it works fine with it too and there's no guideline against it that I can find. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244407 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244407%23c10 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
