https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241961
Petr Menšík <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #7 from Petr Menšík <[email protected]> --- I have took a look into icons/ folder, and there are a lot of licenses for icons not contained in license tag. Also their text are not installed with the package. I don't think that is okay, even though that might create unusually long list. Especially for uncommon licenses this is a must. What is worse some are not present in allowed license list of fedora [1]. It seems to me licenses not already added need to be approved for inclusion in Fedora first. Which might be tiresome process, but I don't think there is a way around. List in LICENSES, which does not seems to be allowed: LicenseRef-CC-BY-SA-3.0-US.txt LicenseRef-LK-Avalon.txt LicenseRef-Tango-Public-Domain.txt LicenseRef-wikimedia-Public-Domain.txt If those would not be allowed, such content would have to be removed also from source archives. 1. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241961 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202241961%23c7 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
