https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235085

Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?([email protected] |needinfo?(loganjerry@gmail.
                   |)                           |com)



--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <[email protected]> ---
> - In any case, the license in __init__.py, the only file that seems to matter,
>  is BSD-2-Clause, not BSD-3-Clause.

ok


>- Upstream packs a bunch of license files into the dist-info.  Since only the
>  bsd-simplified.LICENSE file is relevant, is it worth the effort to prevent
>  the other license files from being installed?  Note that 
> public-domain.LICENSE
>  is empty, so we probably don't want it in any case.


patched out:

Patch:          remove-unused-licenses.patch

>- The README.rst file is installed in both the dist-info directory (with the
>  executable bits stripped off) and in /usr/share/doc (with the executable bits
>  still on).  We probably don't need it in both places.  If you choose to have
>  it in /usr/share/doc, please remove the executable bits.

Removed from %doc

>- This package does not have an ExcludeArch tag.  The code in __init__.py only
>  looks for libmagic.so in /usr/lib64, which will fail on 32-bit x86.

I already part of this, let's patch the rest:
https://github.com/nexB/scancode-plugins/pull/34



Thanks for the review.

Spec URL:
https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-typecode-libmagic.spec
SRPM URL:
https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-typecode-libmagic-21.5.31-1.fc39.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235085

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235085%23c5
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to