Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674152 Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #4 from Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]> 2011-02-16 08:21:42 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) > MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build > produces. The output should be posted in the review.[1] > > Needs this output I think you're supposed to provide that but here it is anyway: mingw32-matahari.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ovirt -> overt, oviduct, oviform mingw32-matahari.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US qpid -> quid, sapid, rapid mingw32-matahari.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ovirt -> overt, oviduct, oviform mingw32-matahari.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US qpid -> quid, sapid, rapid mingw32-matahari.src: W: invalid-url Source0: matahari-matahari-060266b.tgz mingw32-matahari.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: matahari-matahari-060266b.tgz 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. The spelling errors are wrong and the spec explains how to obtain the tarball. [snip] > MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the > Licensing Guidelines . > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual > license. > [3] > > Needs GPLv2+ Fixed. SRPM: http://www.clusterlabs.org/~beekhof/mingw32-matahari-0.4.0-0.12.060266b.git.fc14.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.clusterlabs.org/~beekhof/mingw32-matahari.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
