https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444
Daniel Berrangé <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?([email protected] | |om) | --- Comment #88 from Daniel Berrangé <[email protected]> --- In email discussions offlist, it was agreed that the RPM spec I provided in comment #83 is viable as a way forward. Before approving this though, I need to investigate the 'psw' part of the linux-sgx.git repository, to determine if we should include it as part of the same RPM, or create a separate RPM, and whether the needs of psw require changes to what is proposed for the sdk in #83. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202085444%23c88 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
