https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154514



--- Comment #14 from Mike Rochefort <[email protected]> ---
> I solved the cross-compiling configuration and dependencies with Lua macros

I have this fixed in my unpushed spec, but not using Lua. I don't think
cross-compiling toolchains need to be installed by default or even as a
recommends, so I have an optional -cross-compile-gnu subpackage that requires
binutils and gcc for the correct non-native architectures.

The reason for the -gnu suffix is in the even that it is possible to use the
llvm and clang utilities as a runtime override, then I'm giving it space to
have a -cross-compile-llvm subpackage without needing to do any
provides/obsoletes.

The config itself is still dynamically generated rather than having multiple
architecture configs to select from, but it produces the correct output now.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154514

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202154514%23c14
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to