https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250700

Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |POST



--- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <[email protected]> ---
> However, the fact that the base package is arched is copied from another 
> package I used as a template, and it’s probably unnecessary for this package. 
> Certainly, the comment about endian-dependent test failures is not accurate 
> for this package. Try this:

> New Spec URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/20231121/python-bioread.spec
> New SRPM URL: 
> https://music.fedorapeople.org/20231121/python-bioread-3.0.1-1.fc39.src.rpm


Cool, that now also makes rpmlint happy:

Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python3-bioread-3.0.1-1.fc40.noarch.rpm
          python3-bioread+mat-3.0.1-1.fc40.noarch.rpm
          python3-bioread+hdf5-3.0.1-1.fc40.noarch.rpm
          python3-bioread+all-3.0.1-1.fc40.noarch.rpm
          python-bioread-3.0.1-1.fc40.src.rpm
===========================================================================
rpmlint session starts
==========================================================================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpmrhpt5i6')]
checks: 31, packages: 5

python3-bioread+all.noarch: W: no-documentation
python3-bioread+hdf5.noarch: W: no-documentation
python3-bioread+mat.noarch: W: no-documentation
============================================ 5 packages and 0 specfiles
checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.9 s
===========================================




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 31, packages: 4

python3-bioread+all.noarch: W: no-documentation
python3-bioread+hdf5.noarch: W: no-documentation
python3-bioread+mat.noarch: W: no-documentation
 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings, 0 badness; has taken
0.1 s 





XXX APPROVED XXX


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250700

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250700%23c5
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to