https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251826
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa <[email protected]> --- > a) Many of the files are linked to their copies, so duplicates warning can be > ignored. > b) COPYING file is GPL2, should GPL-2.0-or-later be used as the SPDX > identifier? I have fixed this in the spec and SRPM in-place. > c) Directory co-ownership seems ok > d) Maybe source files should be put in a pagure/GitLab repository owned by > graphics team? If someone has the upstream CVS repo somewhere that can be converted to Git, sure. A Red Hatter may be able to get access to that from the backups. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251826 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202251826%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
