https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098398
--- Comment #10 from Jason Vas Dias <[email protected]> --- Note to maintainers / reviewers - if you do not have any 'pil' / 'picolisp' command in your $PATH when building for the first time, you are Bootstrapping . In that case, IFF a 32-bit Java 1.8 environment is in $PATH (and possibly also $LD_LIBRARY_PATH), then you can cd to the 'src32' directory and run make, that will build the 32-bit Java PicoLisp Simulator, that CAN be used to provide the 'picolisp' command necessary to build the (ONLY!) 64-bit picolisp for the first time. But really, I'd recommend downloading the Ubuntu picolisp binary and building a libc it will link against, then running that, or getting a Fedora-38 built binary from me. Nothing else will suffice to build picolisp other than picolisp, it is its own Assembler / runner of 'opt', the LLVM Code Generator ... You can also build the old pre LLVM/Clang version of pil as a bootstrap picolisp, which is built also by running picolisp as an X86_64 Assembler generator, but that also requires at least the 32-bit simulator to be in $PATH in order to bootstrap. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098398 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202098398%23c10 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
