https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255574
--- Comment #3 from Jeremy Newton <[email protected]> --- Thanks, see updated files: Spec URL: https://mystro256.fedorapeople.org/hiprand.spec SRPM URL: https://mystro256.fedorapeople.org/hiprand-6.0.0-2.fc40.src.rpm > Do we want to add version logic to the rocm packages in BuildRequire ? > This is a for all rocm packages question. Yeah I've been thinking about that. I was going to wait for the llvm changes be put in place, then rehaul the build requires. A lot of them are common, so I was considering a metapackage or adding them as package requires to rocm-comgr-devel or hipcc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255574 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202255574%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
