https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253354
Lyes Saadi <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review? Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #2 from Lyes Saadi <[email protected]> --- Will take this first. I'll look into the second package I owe you after this one. I will review it tomorrow though, since it's 4:40 where I am ^^' ! Just a quick note on this having the same name as an old asl package, I am a bit confused about what procedure this should follow? My best guess is that it should technically follow the unretirement process and also follow https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages and obsolete the old version, as per : > If a package supersedes/replaces an existing package without being a > sufficiently compatible replacement as defined above, use only the Obsoletes: > line from the above example. Although, I am a bit confused about what obsolete would do in this situation... I'll dig further into it tomorrow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253354 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202253354%23c2 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
