https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254392
kb1000 <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(kaeptmblaubaer100 | |[email protected]) | --- Comment #8 from kb1000 <[email protected]> --- I've created https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/615 now. It looks like it was supposed to be created by a bot after you added the fedora-review+ flag, but I guess that didn't work... I was thinking FE-NEEDSPONSOR was all you need but it seems that's not true. Unrelated to that: Someone approached me and requested me to add aarch64 support to the COPR repository. According to the previous maintainer, RenderDoc is only officially supported on x86_64. The person wanting aarch64 support has told me it seems to work, though couldn't fully test it as the drivers weren't fully working (Open-source Nvidia and Asahi with Vulkan, so...). Should I add aarch64 to the package's ExclusiveArch anyways? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254392 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202254392%23c8 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
