https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238191
--- Comment #13 from Daniel Milnes <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Tom Rix from comment #12) > why was the specfile name changed ? Having re-read the Golang Packaging Guidelines, I think I was wrong with my original name for this package. I've renamed it to the version generated by the %{goname} macro. > why is there a devel package when no libraries are distributed ? As far as I can tell, this is the case for all Golang packages (for example: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2085464). I can't see any way to remove the -devel package outside of rewriting the spec file to not use any of the %go macros. All the examples around go2rpm and go-rpm-macros I can see have this behaviour. > golang-github-bazelbuild-bazelisk.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/bin/bazelisk /lib64/libresolv.so.2 This also appears to happen for all Golang packages. Interestingly, rpmlint doesn't flag this for me, but manually running `ldd -u` does. I'm not entirely sure why that happens and will research further. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238191 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202238191%23c13 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
