https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261953

Maxwell G <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|[email protected]    |[email protected]
           Doc Type|---                         |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #2 from Maxwell G <[email protected]> ---
Hmm, this naming situation is a bit of mess, but you did handle it as best as
possible and in compliance with the guidelines.

Maxwell's Python Package Review Template
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated


- [x] The License tag reflects the package contents and uses the correct
identifiers.
- [x] The license text is included and marked with %license.
- [x] The package builds successfully in mock.
- [x] The package is installable (checked by fedora-review).
- [x] There are no relevant rpmlint errors.
- [x] The package runs tests in %check.
- [x] The latest version is packaged or packaging an earlier version is
justified.
- [x] The packager considers avoiding confusing `%foo_name` macros. (Not a
blocker)
- [x] Libraries: The package name has a `python3-` prefix and uses the
canonical project name
- [x] The pyproject macros are used.
- [x] There are no bundled libraries.
- [x] The package complies with the Python and general Packaging Guidelines.

Other problems:

- The URL is wrong. It should be https://github.com/mdomke/python-ulid as far
as I can tell.
- There are unicode quotes in the comment at the top of the specfile and
unicode bullet points in the common_description. I noticed because the Copr
specfile page apparently does not handle unicode encoding properly. I would
personally use standard ASCII quotes and * or - for bullet points, but that's
up to you.
- I would keep the ulid binary and add `Conflicts: golang-github-oklog-ulid` or
maybe rename it to /usr/bin/python-ulid. (I prefer the first solution but would
accept either.) I don't think removing it completely is the right solution.

Thanks!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261953

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202261953%23c2
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to