Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676879 --- Comment #7 from Christos Triantafyllidis <[email protected]> 2011-02-24 05:41:08 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) > > > > I see there is both a GPL LICENSE file but also a "LICENSE.mvapich" file > > which > > is > > probably BSD. Is this dual licensed or something ? Can you clarify. > > According to the last line of vendor's description page: > http://www.osc.edu/~djohnson/mpiexec/index.php#Description > > "Mpiexec is free software and is licensed for use under the GNU General Public > License, version 2." > > Is this sufficient or should i clarify this with vendor? > Closer look revealed that the latest vendor version (0.84) includes files under different license (BSD no advertising, 3 clause). Given that these sources are not possible to be split to a different package, i'll change the license to the multiple scenario (GPLv2 and BSD). I've also found that the vendor doesn't install the license files (as well as changelog and readme) at documents area which i'll add in the next release. So i'm waiting your reply on the naming (whether to add "torque" somewhere or not) and i'll build the new pkg/spec. Christos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
