https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253579
--- Comment #8 from Arthur Bols <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Felix Wang from comment #7) > A minor issue is that package name libayatana-ido-gtk3, instead of > libayatana-ido. The -gtk3 suffix is recommended ? I've doubted a lot about the naming. I tried to choose a convention that is clear to users and in line with other packages, but I'm open to suggestions! Debian uses the upstream naming of the library [0]. They append '3' for GTK3 version and omit it for the GTK2 version. libayatana-appindicator [1] is probably a better example. The old libappindicator [2] appends '-gtk3' for the GTK3 version (as I'm doing), but they omit it for the GTK2 version. I chose to always append the GTK version to make it clear to users which version it is, see libayatana-appindicator [3] for a complete example. [0]: https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/libayatana-ido3-0.4-0 [1]: https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bookworm&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=ayatana-appindicator [2]: https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/libappindicator/ [3]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253582 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253579 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202253579%23c8 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
