https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253363
--- Comment #3 from Jerry James <[email protected]> --- Thank you very much for the review. (In reply to Benson Muite from comment #2) > Comments: > a) Builds on all architectures > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=113847080 > b) Known bug on directory ownership > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2264345 > c) Should patches for: > # Check availability of the popcount instruction at runtime > # Fix out-of-bounds vector accesses > be upstreamed? I can propose the popcount instruction change, but it only works with gcc or clang. A different approach would be needed for other compilers (e.g., for Windows). The out-of-bounds vector access patch should be upstreamed, but I'm still unsure if this is the right fix. I'll try submitting it upstream and see what they think. More concretely, I need to come up with a small test case that exhibits the problem. (It showed up while building mp.) > d) There seems to be a bug concurrently building Fortran interfaces: > https://github.com/ERGO-Code/HiGHS/issues/1614 Interesting. Okay, I will keep an eye on that issue. Thanks for pointing it out. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253363 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202253363%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
