https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268364
--- Comment #3 from Aleksei Bavshin <[email protected]> --- Spec URL: https://alebastr.fedorapeople.org/review/libscfg.spec SRPM URL: https://alebastr.fedorapeople.org/review/libscfg-0.1.1-1.fc40.src.rpm Thanks for the review! > a) Upstream has a test. Can this be run? Fixed. > b) Should pkgconfig be required? There are a few bugs with the > fedora-review directory ownership check. It's already required automatically by pkgconfig dependency generator: Requires -------- ... libscfg-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/pkg-config -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268364 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202268364%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
