https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2264588



--- Comment #8 from Ben Beasley <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Benson Muite from comment #7)
> Comments:
> a) Builds on all architectures:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=114620368
> b) Upstream seems to just build the tests. Maybe some of them can also be
> run?
> c) Approved.

Thank you for the review!

The upstream tests for this particular package are strictly “include tests.”
There is nothing that actually runs: the test is just whether we can include
each header in the header-only library, e.g. [1], compile them, and link them
together into a do-nothing executable with an empty main()[2]. So it’s really
just a “does it compile and link” smoke-test, and that’s it.

If upstream does add some kind of executable functional/unit tests in the
future, I’ll be sure to run them.

[1]
https://github.com/BenHanson/parsertl17/blob/main/tests/include_test/ebnf_tables.cpp
[2]
https://github.com/BenHanson/parsertl17/blob/main/tests/include_test/include_test.cpp


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2264588

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202264588%23c8
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to