https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268679



--- Comment #6 from Sandro <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to José Matos from comment #5)
> Hi Sandro,
>  is there a reason to be using the development version and not the stable
> release?

I anticipated version 0.2.0 is going to be released soon since the tag was
present already. Upstream confirmed that [1] in the discussion regarding my PR
(#39), which evolved into PR #40, which is the patch applied.

> Is that due to the test issue that you identified above.
> 
> Because that is only reason where fedora-review rightly complains:
> - Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
>   in the spec URL.

I'm not seeing any complaint. For rawhide and F40 there's no template
generated. Looking at the F38 template [2] I see:

[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.

That's a pass.

I guess you ran fedora-review after review service.

> The difference is related with changes introduced upstream, while your
> original package used a previous commit.
> The patch is not applied because it is already applied upstream.

I guess upstream may have moved the tag. Very naughty, but permissible, I
suppose, since it wasn't officially released. They mentioned releasing after PR
#40 was merged.

> Other than that this is a simple python package. The licenses are correct
> and admissible on Fedora and the package follows the Fedora package
> guidelines for Python packages.
> 
> Please fix the source issue on import.

I'll do that.

Spec URL: https://gui1ty.fedorapeople.org/review/python-cmap.spec
SRPM URL:
https://gui1ty.fedorapeople.org/review/python-cmap-0.2.0-3.fc41.src.rpm


[1] https://github.com/tlambert03/cmap/pull/39#discussion_r1518611308
[2]
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/%40fedora-review/fedora-review-2268679-python-cmap/fedora-38-x86_64/07129688-python-cmap/fedora-review/review.txt


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268679

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202268679%23c6
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to