https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255828
--- Comment #14 from Tom Rix <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Tomas Tomecek from comment #12) > Agreed with Sergey about the CLI tools: there is many of them, especially > "main", "quantize" and "server" that would be really helpful to have. These > tools have generic names which is unfortunate in context of the whole > operating system. We should prefix them with something like llama.cpp-main, > llama.cpp-quantize, etc. > > I wonder how supported these binaries are because all their sources live in > examples/ dir: https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/tree/master/examples These are examples, they are not part of the normal build, you have to enable LLAMA_BUILD_EXAMPLES to get them to build. If the upstream has not committed to them being part of the normal build and supporting them, we should not either. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255828 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202255828%23c14 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
