https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279277



--- Comment #7 from Petr Menšík <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #3)
> > Source0:        
> > https://github.com/jarikomppa/emu8051/archive/%{gitcommit}.tar.gz#/%{name}-%{gitcommit}.tar.gz
> You can utilize github arbitrary download names instead of the RPM hacks,
> e.g.:
> Source0:       
> https://github.com/jarikomppa/emu8051/archive/%{gitcommit}/%{name}-
> %{gitcommit}.tar.gz

Okay. I tend to not find special github correct paths, so I have derived this
from download button link on web UI. But okay, your is a bit nicer.

> > BuildRequires:  gcc make
> Maybe better to add each requirement on individual line. It's better to
> manage and more clear, e.g. you can easily comment out individual deps.

Unless something very important changes, project like this cannot omit gcc or
make. This does not change anything.

> > sed -e "s,^BIN := emu,BIN := %{name}," -i Makefile
> Why not just use:
> %make_build BIN=%{name}
> You could omit 'sed' build requirement then.
Yeah. I made this before I have realized Makefile does not provide install
target anyway. So I could rename it just in install command.

> 
> > install -m 0755 %{name} %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name}
> Please use '-p' to preserve time stamps.

I do not see any point in keeping time stamp of build, which is different on
each rebuild anyway. What is the point for keeping always changing stamp? It
makes perfect sense on content from source archive. Not on always regenerated
build pieces.

In short. I see every MUST passed. Only with minor formatting or style issues.
Where is my + flag then? :-o


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279277

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202279277%23c7
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to