https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279853

Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends On|182235 (FE-Legal)           |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|[email protected]    |[email protected]



--- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> ---
> And just to understand this better, `tables.rs` should be under 
> `Unicode-DFS-2016` license because it used UCD files to generate it?

This is exactly it, if I understand correctly:
Code generated from Unicode data files is covered by the Unicode-DFS-2016
license.

So the resulting license expression should be `(MIT OR Apache-2.0) AND
Unicode-DFS_2016`.
See also the unicode-ident crate for a very similar case.

Until upstream implements this change, you can patch package.license to fix
this downstream for now.

This is also what we do for crates where the developers disagree with this
assessment and / or disagree about whether the Unicode license needs to be
represented in Cargo.toml (like bstr:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-bstr/blob/rawhide/f/bstr-fix-metadata.diff,
or regex-syntax:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-regex-syntax/blob/rawhide/f/regex-syntax-fix-metadata.diff).

Side note: The same applies to the Rust standard library as well (which is why
bstr and regex doesn't do it either), but Rust Foundation lawyers seem to
disagree with Red Hat lawyers here about whether `AND Unicode-DFS-2016` needs
to be added to the license expression in Cargo.toml. Since we need to placate
Red Hat lawyers here, we need to apply their standard, even if the upstream
projects disagree :)

Other than that, the package looks good to me.



Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235
[Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279853

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202279853%23c6
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to