https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279333
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> --- > Is there a specific reason for using the “traditional” snapshot versioning > style > rather than the current style? Two "minor" reasons: I find the "old" snapshot versioning style without rpmautospec easier to get right. It's also consistent with other elementary project snapshots that I'm working on right now. > %{commitdate}.git%{shortcommit}%{?dist} is <date>.<scm><revision>, which > doesn’t exactly match any of these formats. Correct. Though IMO it's an oversight that this is not a documented format. I find 20240513.gitabc4567 much more readable than 20240513gitabc4567 (and I'm pretty sure only the one *with* the dot sorts correctly wrt/ RPM sorting, in the rare cases where this matters). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279333 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202279333%23c4 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
