https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2291345
--- Comment #6 from Cristian Le <[email protected]> --- > Could you relax on that requirement? Sure, it's just a suggestion. I had to temporarily update a few rust packages in a copr project in order to package some other dependent packages, and I've found that having a `rust2rpm.toml` even if empty was useful there. Otherwise I've resorted to reading the spec file for clues if a `rust2rpm.conf` or `rust2rpm.toml` was used but not packaged (saw that quite a few times). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2291345 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202291345%23c6 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
