https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255751
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Steffan <[email protected]> --- Issues: ======= - Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: perfetto-sdk : /usr/share/perfetto/sdk/perfetto.h See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/#_devel_packages - Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir. See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/#_devel_packages [!]: Development files must be in a -devel package The use of -sdk might be tripping this. [!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines Unversioned soname. [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in perfetto-libs , perfetto-sdk This might be a false finding, but why don't you have the %{?_isa} included everywhere? [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. Missing. [!]: Files in /run, var/run and /var/lock uses tmpfiles.d when appropriate This seems like it's configured correctly in combination with the sysusers. I raise it because I'm not certain if I checked everything required. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255751 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202255751%23c16 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
