https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2291065
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> --- > All current releases of the applications use stable dependencies That's great news! This will certainly make it easier for anybody who wants to package these tools. > see no reason why shipping both rPGP and Sequoia-PGP would be any different > in principle to shipping both OpenSSL and GnuTLS. > If you have additional pointers on why depending on rPGP is a problem for > packaging, I'd appreciate your input. I don't see a specific problem, other than a bit of "duplicated" effort, in the sense that we already have one OpenPGP implementation in Rust available, while the other one will still need to go through packaging + review and will result in additional maintenance burden. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2291065 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202291065%23c4 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
