https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292522
--- Comment #7 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> --- Thank you for the thorough review! > Is it because "supported-arches" there would be used for the whole crate, > because the crate as a whole wouldn't work, > while here it would have to be used only for a subpackage of the crate, > because only this subpackage makes no sense? > I would assume that's impossible to filter it out from the rpm point of view, > however it's still doable to package it friction less thanks to the following > note (...) Yeah. supported-arches only affects which architectures a crate is built on and where tests are run. It doesn't affect the package contents at all. Packages that have "BuildArch: noarch" also aren't filtered out by architecture (they are supposed to be architecture-independent after all), so there's not much that can be done here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292522 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202292522%23c7 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
