Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review
Lewis <[email protected]> has canceled Package Review <[email protected]>'s request for Lewis <[email protected]>'s needinfo: Bug 1853888: Review Request: libLTK - Ladspa v3 ToolKit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853888 --- Comment #23 from Lewis <[email protected]> --- I got back to the project since March. I'm building a website for hosting libLTK and everything that comes from it. Last review raised : Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. Package named libLTK as it mainly installs libLTK.so . I take for example https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libcbor which is named libcbor and provides libcbor.so . Should I rename package? lower case? Should I share some API naming policy to be sure having best practise? In past 4 years libLTK did not changed a lot and serves as a base for extensions libraries. Best regards, Lewis ANESA. -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
