https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2304967
--- Comment #3 from FrantiĊĦek Zatloukal <[email protected]> --- (In reply to David King from comment #2) > I suppose that this is not quite ready yet, but it would be good to get the > results from bug 2304756, regardless. Should the gcc dependencies be behind > a conditional, if the toolchain is clang? Yes, I can (and will) conditionalize it, good point. Apart from that, it should be ready for review/based on and very similar other mozjs packages I own. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2304967 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202304967%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
