https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305524
--- Comment #17 from Bryan Gurney <[email protected]> --- The test failure is from a difference in the spec file in the URL, and the spec file in the source RPM (in the other URL). Yes, COPR's build is successful, but when "fedora-review" runs, it performs its own build, and comparisons between the files given (when I run "fedora-review -n rust-futures-locks"). So your spec file in https://people.redhat.com/minlei/fedpkg/futures-locks/v3/rust-futures-locks.spec is good. But could you please re-generate the source RPM file, to incorporate that in a "v4" sub-directory, by running these commands: $ spectool -g rust-futures-locks.spec $ mkdir SOURCES $ mkdir SPECS $ cp rust-futures-locks.spec SPECS/ $ cp futures-locks-0.7.1.crate SOURCES/ $ mock --buildsrpm -r /etc/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64.cfg --sources SOURCES/ --spec SPECS/rust-futures-locks.spec --resultdir SRPMS/ That's what I did, on an F40 virtual machine, and it now passes that test: "[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305524 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202305524%23c17 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
