https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283539
--- Comment #11 from Sandro <[email protected]> --- Nevermind. I turns out things aren't all that complicated, though a bit tricky nonetheless. It turns out `paraview-data` requires `paraview`. So, `paraview` _and_ `paraview-data` will always be installed for any of the flavors. By extension, I think it is fine to have the plugin require `paraview` as was already the case in the spec file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283539 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202283539%23c11 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
