https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2308448
--- Comment #18 from Ming Lei <[email protected]> --- Hello Fabio, Please review v4, in which the package license issue in comment #16 is addressed. Spec URL: https://people.redhat.com/minlei/fedpkg/rublk/rust-rublk.spec SRPM URL: https://people.redhat.com/minlei/fedpkg/rublk/rust-rublk-0.2.1-1.fc40.src.rpm Description: rust-ublk is one binary which implements generic linux ublk userspace drivers(targets). CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBLK is enabled in Fedora for a while, and is enabled in RHEL10 too. upstream: https://github.com/ublk-org/rublk So far, it is packaged from vendor tarball via 'rust2rpm -V' because some dependent crates can't be pull into Fedora in short time. Follows all non-present crates in Fedora: smol MIT or Apache-2.0 qcow2-rs MIT or Apache-2.0 shared_memory MIT or Apache-2.0 ilog MIT derive_setters MIT or Apache-2.0 block-utils MIT bitmaps MPL-2.0+ I'd plan to pull them step-by-step and finally package rublk in non-verndor tarball. Another motivation is that libublk-rs needs to be package too, which is one library and can't be done in vendor mode. Need sponsor. Fedora Account System Username: minlei2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2308448 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202308448%23c18 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
