https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317589



--- Comment #8 from Ben Beasley <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #7)
> I know the upstream of tox loves pinning and if the time comes for uv 1, I
> can sed this one out. The upstream discussion is not worth it.

I agree that the discussion isn’t necessary if you are confident that you
already know the outcome.

At least it isn’t SemVer-pinned, which would imply <0.5.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317589

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202317589%23c8

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to