https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255751
--- Comment #30 from Davide Cavalca <[email protected]> --- > Is the perfetto-libs subpackage useful even without the main package files? > It seems like it should be. Yes, it provides the shared library that things using perfetto can leverage. > Currently not using tmpfiles.d. Should we be? We actually are using tmpfiles.d already :) > Should the SDK be noarch? Seems so. The SDK has a Requires on the -libs subpackage which is arched, so it cannot be noarch or we'd end up with FTIs. > I also recommend we use the https://github.com/google/perfetto repo as the > source because it's easier to see what is going on, etc. The Google source > control system is ... very Googly. Both are fine so this is just a preference. I generally prefer to avoid mirrors if possible as they tend to get out of date / diverge and that can be painful to reconcile down the road. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255751 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202255751%23c30 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
