https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2316476
Michael Schwendt <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt <[email protected]> --- * Including the licensing terms becomes a MUST, since a file "LICENSE" is found in the source package: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/ * rpmlint indicates that some of the doc files could be included: clap-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation * The generic summary and description for the -devel package don't work as nicely as with other development packages. There is no main package "clap", but %name expands to "clap", and therefore the resulting summary and description look odd: Summary : Development files for clap Description : This package contains development files for clap. You've entered a much better %description for the main package and the source package. Why not use that one for the -devel package? Even more so, since the project seems to be called CLAP in doc files and on the web pages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2316476 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202316476%23c2 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
